Centennial Conference
Team Statistics
Overall Statistics
Centennial Conference Overall Statistics (as of May 16, 2005) (All games Sorted by Batting avg) Team AVG G AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI TB SLG% BB HBP SO GDP OB% SF SH SB-ATT PO A E FLD% Gettysburg.. .325 42 1071 241 348 50 31 7 196 481 .449 85 16 106 0 .381 7 81 23-35 804 349 64 .947 Washington.. .300 36 1002 199 301 37 6 19 163 407 .406 123 8 125 3 .380 5 39 28-30 708 310 69 .937 Ursinus..... .292 47 1291 250 377 62 16 3 215 480 .372 112 20 176 1 .355 10 61 24-26 943 261 49 .961 Dickinson... .281 34 959 129 269 36 6 2 114 323 .337 68 10 121 0 .333 5 43 33-38 695 346 84 .925 McDaniel.... .268 38 1055 163 283 54 2 11 130 374 .355 109 10 207 0 .340 7 19 39-46 781 397 80 .936 Muhlenberg.. .264 33 879 113 232 44 3 1 103 285 .324 78 5 121 2 .326 4 29 11-14 646 326 47 .954 Haverford... .250 37 972 130 243 39 7 2 98 302 .311 74 10 170 1 .308 4 30 49-55 724 351 87 .925 Swarthmore.. .235 36 842 81 198 16 4 5 62 237 .281 80 14 114 3 .311 4 43 36-44 664 322 81 .924 F&M......... .218 34 859 96 187 29 4 6 76 242 .282 72 10 169 1 .285 3 25 77-92 659 287 88 .915 (All games Sorted by Earned run avg) Team ERA W-L G CG SHO/CBO SV IP H R ER BB SO 2B 3B HR AB B/Avg WP HBP BK SFA SHA Ursinus..... 0.98 37-10 47 37 22/4 1 314.1 234 64 44 34 280 45 5 7 1154 .203 2 7 0 1 37 Gettysburg.. 1.83 31-10 42 29 15/2 1 268.0 229 97 70 55 143 52 5 1 1029 .223 5 20 0 5 29 McDaniel.... 2.42 21-17 38 32 5/0 0 260.1 257 144 90 81 142 48 8 5 1028 .250 17 15 1 7 45 Washington.. 2.43 19-17 36 26 3/0 2 236.0 236 139 82 85 130 40 7 5 933 .253 17 9 2 4 36 Muhlenberg.. 2.96 14-19 33 19 3/0 1 215.1 246 138 91 68 95 30 11 13 857 .287 16 4 0 6 40 Haverford... 3.77 11-26 37 19 1/0 2 241.1 301 185 130 68 98 53 5 14 1000 .301 8 12 1 9 45 Dickinson... 3.83 10-24 34 28 1/0 1 232.0 316 203 127 116 85 57 14 3 1001 .316 16 8 0 3 41 Swarthmore.. 4.71 10-26 36 20 3/1 0 221.1 308 218 149 114 106 48 8 10 957 .322 38 17 0 5 47 F&M......... 4.91 6-28 34 6 0/0 1 219.2 314 207 154 103 90 50 15 8 975 .322 8 14 0 13 27 (All games Sorted by Fielding pct) Team C PO A E FLD% DPs SBA CSB SBA% PB CI Ursinus..... 1253 943 261 49 .961 6 21 8 .724 7 0 Muhlenberg.. 1019 646 326 47 .954 14 29 3 .906 17 0 Gettysburg.. 1217 804 349 64 .947 9 15 2 .882 7 0 Washington.. 1087 708 310 69 .937 4 30 4 .882 31 0 McDaniel.... 1258 781 397 80 .936 12 31 6 .838 13 0 Dickinson... 1125 695 346 84 .925 8 41 6 .872 33 0 Haverford... 1162 724 351 87 .925 8 47 7 .870 25 0 Swarthmore.. 1067 664 322 81 .924 10 44 11 .800 24 1 F&M......... 1034 659 287 88 .915 9 47 4 .922 17 0
Category Leaders
Centennial Conference Batting Leaders (as of May 16, 2005) (All games) Hitting minimums - 1 Games 67% of Games 2.0 AB/Game Pitching minimums - 1 Games 1.0 IP/Game Batting avg ----------- 1. Gettysburg.. .325 2. Washington.. .300 3. Ursinus..... .292 4. Dickinson... .281 5. McDaniel.... .268 6. Muhlenberg.. .264 7. Haverford... .250 8. Swarthmore.. .235 9. F&M......... .218 Slugging pct ------------ 1. Gettysburg.. .449 2. Washington.. .406 3. Ursinus..... .372 4. McDaniel.... .355 5. Dickinson... .337 6. Muhlenberg.. .324 7. Haverford... .311 8. F&M......... .282 9. Swarthmore.. .281 On base pct ----------- 1. Gettysburg.. .381 2. Washington.. .380 3. Ursinus..... .355 4. McDaniel.... .340 5. Dickinson... .333 6. Muhlenberg.. .326 7. Swarthmore.. .311 8. Haverford... .308 9. F&M......... .285 Runs scored ----------- 1. Ursinus..... 250 2. Gettysburg.. 241 3. Washington.. 199 4. McDaniel.... 163 5. Haverford... 130 6. Dickinson... 129 7. Muhlenberg.. 113 8. F&M......... 96 9. Swarthmore.. 81 Hits ---- 1. Ursinus..... 377 2. Gettysburg.. 348 3. Washington.. 301 4. McDaniel.... 283 5. Dickinson... 269 6. Haverford... 243 7. Muhlenberg.. 232 8. Swarthmore.. 198 9. F&M......... 187Runs batted in -------------- 1. Ursinus..... 215 2. Gettysburg.. 196 3. Washington.. 163 4. McDaniel.... 130 5. Dickinson... 114 6. Muhlenberg.. 103 7. Haverford... 98 8. F&M......... 76 9. Swarthmore.. 62 Doubles ------- 1. Ursinus..... 62 2. McDaniel.... 54 3. Gettysburg.. 50 4. Muhlenberg.. 44 5. Haverford... 39 6. Washington.. 37 7. Dickinson... 36 8. F&M......... 29 9. Swarthmore.. 16 Triples ------- 1. Gettysburg.. 31 2. Ursinus..... 16 3. Haverford... 7 4. Dickinson... 6 Washington.. 6 6. F&M......... 4 Swarthmore.. 4 8. Muhlenberg.. 3 9. McDaniel.... 2 Home runs --------- 1. Washington.. 19 2. McDaniel.... 11 3. Gettysburg.. 7 4. F&M......... 6 5. Swarthmore.. 5 6. Ursinus..... 3 7. Haverford... 2 Dickinson... 2 9. Muhlenberg.. 1 Total bases ----------- 1. Gettysburg.. 481 2. Ursinus..... 480 3. Washington.. 407 4. McDaniel.... 374 5. Dickinson... 323 6. Haverford... 302 7. Muhlenberg.. 285 8. F&M......... 242 9. Swarthmore.. 237 Total plate appearances ----------------------- 1. Ursinus..... 1494 2. Gettysburg.. 1260 3. McDaniel.... 1200 4. Washington.. 1179 5. Haverford... 1090 6. Dickinson... 1085 7. Muhlenberg.. 995 8. Swarthmore.. 983 9. F&M......... 969 At bats ------- 1. Ursinus..... 1291 2. Gettysburg.. 1071 3. McDaniel.... 1055 4. Washington.. 1002 5. Haverford... 972 6. Dickinson... 959 7. Muhlenberg.. 879 8. F&M......... 859 9. Swarthmore.. 842 Walks ----- 1. Washington.. 123 2. Ursinus..... 112 3. McDaniel.... 109 4. Gettysburg.. 85 5. Swarthmore.. 80 6. Muhlenberg.. 78 7. Haverford... 74 8. F&M......... 72 9. Dickinson... 68 Hit by pitch ------------ 1. Ursinus..... 20 2. Gettysburg.. 16 3. Swarthmore.. 14 4. Haverford... 10 F&M......... 10 McDaniel.... 10 Dickinson... 10 8. Washington.. 8 9. Muhlenberg.. 5 Strikeouts ---------- 1. McDaniel.... 207 2. Ursinus..... 176 3. Haverford... 170 4. F&M......... 169 5. Washington.. 125 6. Dickinson... 121 Muhlenberg.. 121 8. Swarthmore.. 114 9. Gettysburg.. 106 Sac bunts --------- 1. Gettysburg.. 81 2. Ursinus..... 61 3. Dickinson... 43 Swarthmore.. 43 5. Washington.. 39 6. Haverford... 30 7. Muhlenberg.. 29 8. F&M......... 25 9. McDaniel.... 19 Sac flies --------- 1. Ursinus..... 10 2. McDaniel.... 7 Gettysburg.. 7 4. Dickinson... 5 Washington.. 5 6. Muhlenberg.. 4 Haverford... 4 Swarthmore.. 4 9. F&M......... 3 Stolen bases ------------ 1. F&M......... 77 2. Haverford... 49 3. McDaniel.... 39 4. Swarthmore.. 36 5. Dickinson... 33 6. Washington.. 28 7. Ursinus..... 24 8. Gettysburg.. 23 9. Muhlenberg.. 11 Caught stealing --------------- 1. F&M......... 15 2. Gettysburg.. 12 3. Swarthmore.. 8 4. McDaniel.... 7 5. Haverford... 6 6. Dickinson... 5 7. Muhlenberg.. 3 8. Ursinus..... 2 Washington.. 2 Steal attempts -------------- 1. F&M......... 92 2. Haverford... 55 3. McDaniel.... 46 4. Swarthmore.. 44 5. Dickinson... 38 6. Gettysburg.. 35 7. Washington.. 30 8. Ursinus..... 26 9. Muhlenberg.. 14 Grounded into DP ---------------- 1. Swarthmore.. 3 Washington.. 3 3. Muhlenberg.. 2 4. Ursinus..... 1 Haverford... 1 F&M......... 1
Centennial Conference Pitching Leaders (as of May 16, 2005) (All games) Hitting minimums - 1 Games 67% of Games 2.0 AB/Game Pitching minimums - 1 Games 1.0 IP/Game Earned run avg -------------- 1. Ursinus..... 0.98 2. Gettysburg.. 1.83 3. McDaniel.... 2.42 4. Washington.. 2.43 5. Muhlenberg.. 2.96 6. Haverford... 3.77 7. Dickinson... 3.83 8. Swarthmore.. 4.71 9. F&M......... 4.91 Opposing bat avg ---------------- 1. Ursinus..... .203 2. Gettysburg.. .223 3. McDaniel.... .250 4. Washington.. .253 5. Muhlenberg.. .287 6. Haverford... .301 7. Dickinson... .316 8. Swarthmore.. .322 9. F&M......... .322 Innings pitched --------------- 1. Ursinus..... 314.1 2. Gettysburg.. 268.0 3. McDaniel.... 260.1 4. Haverford... 241.1 5. Washington.. 236.0 6. Dickinson... 232.0 7. Swarthmore.. 221.1 8. F&M......... 219.2 9. Muhlenberg.. 215.1 Batters struck out ------------------ 1. Ursinus..... 280 2. Gettysburg.. 143 3. McDaniel.... 142 4. Washington.. 130 5. Swarthmore.. 106 6. Haverford... 98 7. Muhlenberg.. 95 8. F&M......... 90 9. Dickinson... 85 Batters SO out looking ---------------------- 1. Ursinus..... 73 2. McDaniel.... 43 3. Washington.. 40 4. Gettysburg.. 39 5. Dickinson... 32 6. Haverford... 31 Muhlenberg.. 31 8. Swarthmore.. 30 9. F&M......... 22Wins ---- 1. Ursinus..... 37 2. Gettysburg.. 31 3. McDaniel.... 21 4. Washington.. 19 5. Muhlenberg.. 14 6. Haverford... 11 7. Dickinson... 10 Swarthmore.. 10 9. F&M......... 6 Losses ------ 1. F&M......... 28 2. Swarthmore.. 26 Haverford... 26 4. Dickinson... 24 5. Muhlenberg.. 19 6. McDaniel.... 17 Washington.. 17 8. Ursinus..... 10 Gettysburg.. 10 Saves ----- 1. Washington.. 2 Haverford... 2 3. Dickinson... 1 Muhlenberg.. 1 Ursinus..... 1 Gettysburg.. 1 F&M......... 1 Runners picked off ------------------ 1. Washington.. 4 2. Swarthmore.. 3 3. Muhlenberg.. 2 4. McDaniel.... 1 F&M......... 1 Sac bunts allowed ----------------- 1. Swarthmore.. 47 2. McDaniel.... 45 Haverford... 45 4. Dickinson... 41 5. Muhlenberg.. 40 6. Ursinus..... 37 7. Washington.. 36 8. Gettysburg.. 29 9. F&M......... 27 Sac flies allowed ----------------- 1. F&M......... 13 2. Haverford... 9 3. McDaniel.... 7 4. Muhlenberg.. 6 5. Swarthmore.. 5 Gettysburg.. 5 7. Washington.. 4 8. Dickinson... 3 9. Ursinus..... 1 Hits allowed ------------ 1. Gettysburg.. 229 2. Ursinus..... 234 3. Washington.. 236 4. Muhlenberg.. 246 5. McDaniel.... 257 6. Haverford... 301 7. Swarthmore.. 308 8. F&M......... 314 9. Dickinson... 316 Runs allowed ------------ 1. Ursinus..... 64 2. Gettysburg.. 97 3. Muhlenberg.. 138 4. Washington.. 139 5. McDaniel.... 144 6. Haverford... 185 7. Dickinson... 203 8. F&M......... 207 9. Swarthmore.. 218 Earned runs allowed ------------------- 1. Ursinus..... 44 2. Gettysburg.. 70 3. Washington.. 82 4. McDaniel.... 90 5. Muhlenberg.. 91 6. Dickinson... 127 7. Haverford... 130 8. Swarthmore.. 149 9. F&M......... 154 Walks allowed ------------- 1. Ursinus..... 34 2. Gettysburg.. 55 3. Haverford... 68 Muhlenberg.. 68 5. McDaniel.... 81 6. Washington.. 85 7. F&M......... 103 8. Swarthmore.. 114 9. Dickinson... 116 Doubles allowed --------------- 1. Muhlenberg.. 30 2. Washington.. 40 3. Ursinus..... 45 4. Swarthmore.. 48 McDaniel.... 48 6. F&M......... 50 7. Gettysburg.. 52 8. Haverford... 53 9. Dickinson... 57 Triples allowed --------------- 1. Gettysburg.. 5 Haverford... 5 Ursinus..... 5 4. Washington.. 7 5. McDaniel.... 8 Swarthmore.. 8 7. Muhlenberg.. 11 8. Dickinson... 14 9. F&M......... 15 Home runs allowed ----------------- 1. Gettysburg.. 1 2. Dickinson... 3 3. Washington.. 5 McDaniel.... 5 5. Ursinus..... 7 6. F&M......... 8 7. Swarthmore.. 10 8. Muhlenberg.. 13 9. Haverford... 14 Wild pitches ------------ 1. Swarthmore.. 38 2. Washington.. 17 McDaniel.... 17 4. Dickinson... 16 Muhlenberg.. 16 6. Haverford... 8 F&M......... 8 8. Gettysburg.. 5 9. Ursinus..... 2 Balks ----- 1. Washington.. 2 2. Haverford... 1 McDaniel.... 1 Hit batters ----------- 1. Gettysburg.. 20 2. Swarthmore.. 17 3. McDaniel.... 15 4. F&M......... 14 5. Haverford... 12 6. Washington.. 9 7. Dickinson... 8 8. Ursinus..... 7 9. Muhlenberg.. 4 Intentional BB allowed ---------------------- Centennial Conference Fielding Leaders (as of May 16, 2005) (All games) Hitting minimums - 1 Games 67% of Games Pitching minimums - 1 Games 1.0 IP/Game Fielding pct ------------ 1. Ursinus..... .961 2. Muhlenberg.. .954 3. Gettysburg.. .947 4. Washington.. .937 5. McDaniel.... .936 6. Dickinson... .925 7. Haverford... .925 8. Swarthmore.. .924 9. F&M......... .915 Chances ------- 1. McDaniel.... 1258 2. Ursinus..... 1253 3. Gettysburg.. 1217 4. Haverford... 1162 5. Dickinson... 1125 6. Washington.. 1087 7. Swarthmore.. 1067 8. F&M......... 1034 9. Muhlenberg.. 1019 Putouts ------- 1. Ursinus..... 943 2. Gettysburg.. 804 3. McDaniel.... 781 4. Haverford... 724 5. Washington.. 708 6. Dickinson... 695 7. Swarthmore.. 664 8. F&M......... 659 9. Muhlenberg.. 646 Assists ------- 1. McDaniel.... 397 2. Haverford... 351 3. Gettysburg.. 349 4. Dickinson... 346 5. Muhlenberg.. 326 6. Swarthmore.. 322 7. Washington.. 310 8. F&M......... 287 9. Ursinus..... 261 Errors ------ 1. F&M......... 88 2. Haverford... 87 3. Dickinson... 84 4. Swarthmore.. 81 5. McDaniel.... 80 6. Washington.. 69 7. Gettysburg.. 64 8. Ursinus..... 49 9. Muhlenberg.. 47 Fielding double plays --------------------- 1. Muhlenberg.. 14 2. McDaniel.... 12 3. Swarthmore.. 10 4. Gettysburg.. 9 F&M......... 9 6. Haverford... 8 Dickinson... 8 8. Ursinus..... 6 9. Washington.. 4 Stolen bases against -------------------- 1. Haverford... 47 F&M......... 47 3. Swarthmore.. 44 4. Dickinson... 41 5. McDaniel.... 31 6. Washington.. 30 7. Muhlenberg.. 29 8. Ursinus..... 21 9. Gettysburg.. 15 Caught stealing by ------------------ 1. Swarthmore.. 11 2. Ursinus..... 8 3. Haverford... 7 4. Dickinson... 6 McDaniel.... 6 6. Washington.. 4 F&M......... 4 8. Muhlenberg.. 3 9. Gettysburg.. 2 Steal attempts against ---------------------- 1. Swarthmore.. 55 2. Haverford... 54 3. F&M......... 51 4. Dickinson... 47 5. McDaniel.... 37 6. Washington.. 34 7. Muhlenberg.. 32 8. Ursinus..... 29 9. Gettysburg.. 17 Passed balls ------------ 1. Dickinson... 33 2. Washington.. 31 3. Haverford... 25 4. Swarthmore.. 24 5. Muhlenberg.. 17 F&M......... 17 7. McDaniel.... 13 8. Ursinus..... 7 Gettysburg.. 7 Catchers interference --------------------- 1. Swarthmore.. 1